RoboQuest: Generalist Physical Agents that Search, Inspect and Test
Abstract
Recent advances in multimodal foundation models have made them capable generalist physical agents for a range of manipulation tasks. However, successful operation in an unfamiliar environment may require an agent to seek task-relevant information through interaction when it is absent from the observations: it may need to determine where a relevant object is, inspect an unobserved property, or discover the effect of an unfamiliar tool. We thus introduce RoboQuest, a benchmark for goal-directed embodied exploration, where agents must actively acquire task-relevant information through physical interaction, use the resulting evidence to adapt subsequent actions, and autonomously decide when to commit to task completion. RoboQuest comprises ten mobile manipulation tasks centered on three forms of uncertainty: search, manipulation-based inspection, and interactive testing. We evaluate five frontier multimodal agents through a common visuomotor interface, as well as a π_{0.5} policy fine-tuned on the full-episode demonstrations we release. The best agent succeeds in only 23\% of the episodes, and the fine-tuned policy almost never succeeds. Isolated tests of the execution skills the tasks are built from, with the hidden information supplied, show that the agents can carry out most of the required actions, and our failure analysis attributes only a minority of the failures to execution. Our failure analysis further finds that the agents often stop exploring too early as they make decisions before observing the required evidence for task completion. We also find that agents rarely prevent or repair the disturbances caused by their exploration. Moreover, learning by trial and error remains difficult for most models.
Community
RoboQuest: A benchmark for goal-directed embodied exploration. The best frontier model, GPT-6 Astra, performs at just 23%, while Opus 5.5 achieves 13%.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- LIBERO-Agent: Evaluating General-Purpose Agents for Direct Embodied Manipulation (2026)
- CodeActionBench: Evaluating Agentic Code-as-Policy for Embodied Manipulation (2026)
- Are Frontier VLM Agents Ready to Be Robot Generalists? An Empirical Study with the Embodied Agent Arena (2026)
- World Action Agent: Harnessing VLMs for Robot Manipulation via World Action Rehearsal (2026)
- MotorMind: Scaffolding General Vision Language Models for Zero-Shot Robot Manipulation (2026)
- 2AM: Grounding Agent-Side Memory as Guidance for Steerable Action Models in Long-Horizon Manipulation (2026)
- CAPEX: Efficiently Distilling Foundation Model Behavior into Deployable Robot Policies through Experience-Adaptive Reasoning (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2610.10388 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 1
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper