PANINI-DR: Controlled Deep Research through Generative Semantic Workspaces
Abstract
PANINI-DR is a multi-agent research harness that separates investigation coordination from subquestion verification using a shared workspace, achieving state-of-the-art results on deep-research benchmarks.
Deep research requires connecting multiple steps of search, reasoning, and computation, with intermediate findings guiding what to investigate next. As investigations grow, agents must maintain research state across model calls and check findings before errors propagate into subsequent work. We introduce PANINI-DR, a multi-agent harness that separates coordination of the overall investigation from the research and verification of individual subquestions. A shared workspace, built on the Generative Semantic Workspace representation, records subquestions, their dependencies, findings, and supporting evidence. Researchers investigate individual subquestions, while a separate verification agent checks proposed answers against those subquestions and their evidence. Verification feedback guides further investigation, and recorded findings inform subsequent assignments. We evaluate PANINI-DR on BrowseComp-Plus, FRAMES, and MoNaCo against seven state-of-the-art deep-research harnesses, all using a shared language-model backbone and frozen corpora. PANINI-DR achieves the strongest average performance across the three benchmarks. On BrowseComp-Plus, it achieves 73.3% accuracy, outperforming the next-best harness by 16.0 points. Its advantage is strongest on hard questions, where it answers nearly twice as many as the next-best harness. Ablations further show that structured planning and persistent state improve performance, as does checking each finding against its cited evidence before it is reused. Because a model can answer correctly from memory alone, we also analyze the evidence retained by each harness. PANINI-DR achieves the highest answer recoverability from saved evidence on all three benchmarks, while complementary claim-support audits show stronger evidence-backed answers. Accounting for this evidence changes how harnesses compare and further strengthens PANINI-DR's advantage.
Community
Deep research requires connecting multiple steps of search, reasoning, and computation, with intermediate findings guiding what to investigate next. As investigations grow, agents must maintain research state across model calls and check findings before errors propagate into subsequent work. We introduce Panini-DR, a multi-agent harness that separates coordination of the overall investigation from the research and verification of individual subquestions. A shared workspace, built on the Generative Semantic Workspace representation, records subquestions, their dependencies, findings, and supporting evidence. Researchers investigate individual subquestions, while a separate verification agent checks proposed answers against those subquestions and their evidence. Verification feedback guides further investigation, and recorded findings inform subsequent assignments. We evaluate Panini-DR on BrowseComp-Plus, FRAMES, and MoNaCo against seven baseline implementations using a shared language-model backbone and frozen corpora. Panini-DR achieves the strongest average performance across the three benchmarks, with strong gains on harder questions. On BrowseComp-Plus, Panini-DR achieves 73.3% accuracy, outperforming the next-best baseline by 16.0 percentage points, at higher inference cost. Its advantage is strongest on harder investigations, correctly answering 26 of 50 hard questions—nearly twice as many as the next-best baseline. Our ablation studies further show that structured planning and persistent state improve performance, as does verification combined with evidence checks. To assess whether correct answers are supported by the research performed, we also analyze the evidence retained by each system. Panini-DR achieves the highest answer recoverability from saved evidence on all three benchmarks, while complementary claim-support audits show stronger evidence-backed answers. Accounting for this evidence changes how systems compare and further strengthens Panini-DR's advantage over existing approaches.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- LongCat-DeepResearch Technical Report (2026)
- From Delivery to Stateful Exploration: Rethinking the Index for Agentic Search (2026)
- EviGraph: Towards Verifiable Evidence Construction for Information-Seeking Agents (2026)
- CoEM: Empowering Long-Context Reasoning with Commit-on-Evidence Memory (2026)
- Question's Gambit: The First Move Matters in Agentic Deep Search (2026)
- T-Search: An Open Agentic Retriever and Playground for Hard Multi-Step Search (2026)
- Explore Before Committing: Hypothesis-Guided Search for Deep Research Agents (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Authors here. PANINI-DR is a multi-agent deep-research harness built on two ideas: keep the investigation's state explicit in a shared workspace (subquestions, their dependencies, findings and evidence), and have a separate Verifier check every intermediate finding against its cited evidence before later steps use it.
With all harnesses on the same model (gpt-oss-120b), frozen corpora and retrieval service, PANINI-DR reaches 73.3% on BrowseComp-Plus, 16.0 points above the next-best of seven state-of-the-art harnesses, and answers nearly twice as many hard questions. It also has the highest share of answers backed by its saved evidence on BrowseComp-Plus, FRAMES and MoNaCo.
Code (Apache-2.0): https://github.com/roychowdhuryresearch/panini-dr
Project page, with an interactive version of Figure 1: https://roychowdhuryresearch.github.io/PANINI-DR_Project_Page/
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2610.15208 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper