CRM-Agent-Bench: Benchmarking Tool-Using Agents in Stateful Enterprise Environments
Abstract
The study introduces an execution-grounded benchmark for evaluating deployable language agents on multi-turn business tasks using strict contract-based success criteria across outcome, trajectory, viability, and compliance.
Deploying language agents in real applications demands more than the right answer: an agent must execute a multi-step business process correctly, follow domain-specific rules, and interact with a user across a dialogue, where the gap between saying and doing is the gap between a satisfied customer and a real loss. We argue that a deployable-agent benchmark should jointly assess four facets: the outcome an agent reaches, the trajectory it takes, its operational viability, and its policy compliance. Customer relationship management (CRM), where mutable records meet operational rules and consequential effects, exercises all four. We introduce CRM-Agent-Bench, an execution-grounded benchmark of 555 stateful, multi-turn tasks across nine business domains and 36 capability tags. Each task supplies a task-specific executable contract drawn from checks over actions, arguments, order, response, target state, and protected state; success is the strict conjunction of the checks declared for that task. We evaluate the complete agent system through these contracts and report scored coverage, latency, and cost. Across sixteen systems evaluated on the audited final release, strict success spans 64.32% to 83.60%; the closely grouped leading systems nonetheless diverge sharply in cost and per-domain reliability. CRM-Agent-Bench offers an auditable framework for measuring contract-grounded business-transaction integrity and adherence to task-declared benchmark policies, with a portable structure designed for extension as models improve. Github repository: https://github.com/salesforce-misc/crm-agent-bench
Community
CRM-Agent-Bench evaluates whether tool-using agents complete multi-turn business workflows correctly, not merely whether they produce plausible responses.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- EGI-BENCH: An Enterprise General Intelligence Benchmark Suite (2026)
- ERPBench: A State-Grounded Evaluation Paradigm for Computer-Use Agents in Enterprise Software (2026)
- BizAgentBench: Unveiling Hidden Challenges in Deploying Long-Horizon Agents for Real-World Business (2026)
- Do LLM Agents Execute the Plans They Declare? From Planning-Mode Declaration to Pattern-Specific Execution (2026)
- Salesforce Koa: An Enterprise Language Model for Agentic Tool Use (2026)
- AssetForge: Asset-Augmented Task Synthesis for Business Automation Agents (2026)
- Evaluating LLMs as Agentic Workflow Executors in Real-World Customer Support Skills (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2610.32004 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper