RL now is where the real action is, it's the engine behind autonomous tech, robots, and the next wave of AI that thinks, moves and solves problems on its own. To stay up to date with what’s happening in RL, we offer some fresh materials on it:
1. "Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback" by Nathan Lambert -> https://rlhfbook.com/ It's a short introduction to RLHF, explaining instruction tuning, reward modeling, alignment methods, synthetic data, evaluation, and more
2. "A Course in Reinforcement Learning (2nd Edition)" by Dimitri P. Bertsekas -> https://www.mit.edu/~dimitrib/RLbook.html Explains dynamic programming (DP) and RL, diving into rollout algorithms, neural networks, policy learning, etc. It’s packed with solved exercises and real-world examples
4. "Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning" by Stefano V. Albrecht, Filippos Christianos, and Lukas Schäfer -> https://www.marl-book.com/ Covers models, core ideas of multi-agent RL (MARL) and modern approaches to combining it with deep learning
5. "Reinforcement Learning: A Comprehensive Overview" by Kevin P. Murphy -> https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.05265 Explains RL and sequential decision making, covering value-based, policy-gradient, model-based, multi-agent RL methods, RL+LLMs, and RL+inference and other topics
Less is More for Reasoning (LIMO): a 32B model fine-tuned with 817 examples can beat o1-preview on math reasoning! 🤯
Do we really need o1's huge RL procedure to see reasoning emerge? It seems not. Researchers from Shanghai Jiaotong University just demonstrated that carefully selected examples can boost math performance in large language models using SFT —no huge datasets or RL procedures needed.
Their procedure allows Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct to jump from 6.5% to 57% on AIME and from 59% to 95% on MATH, while using only 1% of the data in previous approaches.
⚡ The Less-is-More Reasoning Hypothesis: ‣ Minimal but precise examples that showcase optimal reasoning patterns matter more than sheer quantity ‣ Pre-training knowledge plus sufficient computational resources at inference levels up math skills
➡️ Core techniques: ‣ High-quality reasoning chains with self-verification steps ‣ 817 handpicked problems that encourage deeper reasoning ‣ Enough inference-time computation to allow extended reasoning
💪 Efficiency gains: ‣ Only 817 examples instead of 100k+ ‣ 40.5% absolute improvement across 10 diverse benchmarks, outperforming models trained on 100x more data
This really challenges the notion that SFT leads to memorization rather than generalization! And opens up reasoning to GPU-poor researchers 🚀